Current Project
KonsortSWD - Consortium for the Social, Behavioural, Educational and Economic Sciences in the National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI)
Researchers in the social, behavioral, educational, and economic sciences work with different types of data that are considered particularly sensitive due to legal or ethical restrictions and that were not originally collected for research purposes.
KonsortSWD aims to assist researchers working together on multi- and interdisciplinary projects to implement research data management (RDM) plans. The 14 institutions in KonsortSWD are contributing their experience in the operation of user-oriented research data infrastructures to the National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI) in order to strengthen, expand, and deepen a research data infrastructure for the study of human society. The project is primarily user-driven and addresses the needs of the research communities involved.
The core of KonsortSWD’s RDM strategy is to provide researchers and research data centers (RDCs) with the tools and services they need for managing and sharing (new) sensitive and non-sensitive data in compliance with the FAIR principles for scientific data management and stewardship. This will include supporting sustainable RDM in all phases of the research data lifecycle and ensuring data accessibility, while taking ethical and legal considerations into account. Further information can be found on the consortium's website and first publications of the Measures are available on the multidisciplinary repository Zenodo.
KonsortSWD is divided into five task areas: Community Participation (mainly the responsibility of the RatSWD office), Data Access, Data Production, Technical Solutions and the Secretariat. In the Task Areas, various services for researchers and research data centres are developed and offered within the framework of individual sub-projects – called Measures. SOEP is coordinating Task Area 4 “Integrating Data” and is responsible for the individual measures TA2.M5 (RDCnet) and TA2.M4 (Open Data Format).
Management: Jan Goebel
Coordination: Janina Britzke
| TA3.M01 | Harmonized Variables - Combining Survey Data more Easily through Standardised and Harmonised Variables | 2020-2023 |
| TA3.M02 | Supporting research data management in qualitative social research | 2020-2025 |
| TA3.M03 | Linking Textual Data | 2020-2025 |
| TA3.M04 | CODI – A service for coding open responses in surveys | 2020-2023 |
| TA3.M05 | Open Data Format | 2020-2025 |
| TA3.M09 | Data infrastructures for the research of societal crisis phenomena | 2024-2025 |
| TA3.M10 | ForSynData | 2024-2025 |
The seven subprojects listed above focus on the following areas of research and service provision:
In the years to come, we aim to provide additional benefits to the community of data producers by making the standards and tools of research data management sustainable and by improving long-term archiving. For data users, the quantity of available data and the range of different data types will be expanded by enabling linkage of data types and opening up new possibilities for the use of existing data.
Project lead: Knut Wenzig
Collaborators: Xiaoyao Han, Tom Hartl
The principles of good scientific practice require that the steps of the research process, as well as the materials used or produced, be documented in a transparent and traceable manner and made accessible for reuse. Throughout the research data lifecycle, numerous documents are created to document the research process, such as descriptions of the study design, questionnaires, codebooks, descriptive summaries, and replication code for data analyses. Ideally, each of these documents should be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable.
One approach to meeting these requirements is the use of metadata to organize the research process. At present, social scientists use a variety of software tools for data analysis, some of which are proprietary and handle metadata in different ways. In addition, some metadata are not accessible directly through the data file itself but are instead provided in PDF documents or on websites. The different data formats used by statistical software packages, which are only partially compatible with one another, represent an obstacle to replication studies. Proprietary data formats in particular pose a risk to the requirement of interoperability established by the FAIR principles.
The aim of the project is to promote open and FAIR-compliant research practices in the social and economic sciences. To this end, an open, non-proprietary data format enriched with additional information is being developed. The format is compatible with commonly used statistical software while at the same time providing standardized access to the associated metadata.
Website:
https://opendataformat.github.io/
KonsortSWD:
https://www.konsortswd.de/angebote/open-data-format/
Extensions and use cases:
R: https://git.soep.de/opendata/r-package-opendataformat
Stata: https://opendataformat.github.io/stata-package.html
Python: https://opendataformat.github.io/python-package-opendataformat
SOEP data in Open Data Format:
Working with SOEP Data in Open Data Format
Project lead: Jan Goebel
Collaborators: Neil Murray, Kenny Pedrique
To create the optimal conditions for empirical research, it is crucial that data access is easy as well as secure. Researchers are normally able to access anonymized microdata after signing a contract with the data provider, but in the case of detailed, weakly anonymized data, data can only be used on-site at guest researcher workstations, which often means spending large amounts of time and money. Improving access to sensitive data is an important criterion for maximizing research potential.
KonsortSWD Measure TA2.M2 aims to close this gap. It will establish a research data infrastructure network (RDCnet) connecting guest researcher workstations at the participating research data centers in a network of secure data access points. This will enable researchers to access sensitive data from any of the participating guest researcher workstations. By improving ease of access, the measure will increase the number of data users, while leaving control over the ultimate distribution of the datasets with the data providers to ensure adherence individual standards of data security.
For more information, please visit the consortium website. Previous publications of the measure are available on the multidisciplinary repository Zenodo.
(Working Paper / KonsortSWD ; 1) | Neil Murray, Jan Goebel